• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!


  • Subject: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
  • From: Dov Rosenberg <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:50:52 -0400
  • Thread-topic: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!

Tapestry has something similar using annotations. Tapestry was developed by
an ex-WO person and follows a lot of the same WO type conventions - i.e.
HTML file, xml WOD like file, java file. But with Tapestry 4 they added the
ability to replace the xml file with inline declarations in the html.

We have been looking at Tapestry as a WO replacement - seems like it would
work for us- just require a lot of work to convert things over




On 8/12/06 8:38 PM, "Pierce T. Wetter III" <email@hidden> wrote:

>
>
>   Starting hopefully a new, productive thread of discussion.
>
>   Personally, I find the whole way WO does dynamic tags to be very
> 1995...
>
>   These days, I think WO should have tags more along the lines of
> what's become more of a standard: legal XHTML tags like the following:
>
>   <span  woid:replace="food">Sample Data</span>
>
> (accompanying WOD)
>
>    food: WOString
>    {
>      value=session.food; /// hmmm... I must be hungry.
>    }
>
>   The big problem for the WYSIWYG editors has always been that they
> have to read two places to figure out what a tag resolves to in HTML
> terms. Why not have:
>
> <form woid:attributes="hamburger">
>    ...stuff
> </form>
>
> hamburger : WOForm
> {
>
> }
>
> Perhaps rather then whine about WOB dying, we should turn dreamweaver/
> Golive/That firefox thing into WOB...
>
>   What do you all think? Really, it's just a matter of replacing the
> template parser, and thanks to jadclipse, that stuff all has the
> source available...
>
>
>   Pierce
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden

--
Dov Rosenberg
Conviveon/Inquira
Knowledge Management Experts
http://www.conviveon.com
http://www.inquira.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags! (From: "Pierce T. Wetter III" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Marketing WO
  • Next by Date: Re: Marketing WO
  • Previous by thread: Re: WOComponents are dead, long live smart tags!
  • Next by thread: WOBuilder Value
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread