• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Foundation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Foundation


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:21:58 +0200

Any talk of Google Adwords frightens me. How did you hear about ruby
on rails ? python ? tapestry ? struts ? Was it that you stumbled on a
Google Adword, or was it the buzz generated by the respective
communities and the knock on reviews on cnet, slashdot and wired ?

I agree here. As long WO is not open-source, it doesn't make sense for the community to take up this role. Wanted to point this out by linking to articlesin my prior post, ie. making it with WO news / advocacy into the editorial space, not the paid ad space.

[ IMO, Apple could/should have bought AdWords when WO was still
considered a boxed product..oh well, does the TimeMachine in 10.5 have
a secret AIMF button for WebObjects 5.0 :) ]

Here's some fun:
Try a google blog search on ruby on rails, limited to posts in the
last day:
http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&q=ruby+on
+rails&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=d

An interesting post I got from this link happens to be "Project Able" responding to the popularity of RoR for Java developers...

http://blogs.opensymphony.com/plightbo/2006/08/project_able_a_complete_java_w.html

WO might still raise attention from people looking for an easier way
to accomplish things in Java other than  J2EE from big vendors, ie.
developers looking at

- Project Able
- https://trails.dev.java.net
...

and similar.

I guess more developers got to know about WebObjects looking at
Tapestry - reading about the inspiration for /history of Tapestry... -
than otherwise, but I can't prove it :)

For advocacy or a  foundation to have the best effect in my opinion
for new blood / expanding the community - as someone shouted these
past days in Caps-Lock - WO should go opensource.

So I could start screaming OIMF! instead of AIMF! but that's beating a
dead horse discussed many times...and only Apple can decide on that
issue.

Marc
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Next by Date: Getting a DIV's content and keeping page context
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread