• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects Foundation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects Foundation


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • From: Johan Henselmans <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:52:25 +0200


I am a bit surprised about all this discussion of using non- WebObjects solutions for a WebObjects site. As far as I know there is


-a WebObjects wiki (http://wodev.spearway.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/WODev.)
-a Webobjects CMS (http://sourceforge.net/projects/gvcsitemaker/)
-a Webobjects BugTracker (See Example Applications in Wonder in http://sourceforge.net/projects/wonder)


three opensource attempts at replicating WebObjects functionality and API's:

-GSWEB (http://www.gnustepweb.org/)
-SOPE/JOPE (http://sope.opengroupware.org/)
-WOTONOMY (http://sourceforge.net/projects/wotonomy)

a site that collects WO code snippets  (http://www.wocode.com)

some site that propagate using WebObjects

with movies of how to use webobjects:
http://rentzsch.com/webobjects/introTo5
http://woworx.visionworxpro.com/

and books
(See some of the sites for links)

So it seems that all the elements that are needed for making a nice WebObjects presence, make it as open source as possible and organize a proper foundation are already in place. It is all a bit scattered, and I think that it would be better to focus on getting these things nicely organized, and working properly and make sure that they are kept up to date.

What I miss:
-proper examples (no more 'the rest of the implementation is simple and is left as an exercise to the reader').


-a real nice and complete implementation of all the possible ways one can use web objects: HTML, WebServices, AJAX, JavaClient, DirectToWeb, DirectToJava, with forms, mailings, print reports etc, preferably for one problem-space.
The thinkmovies example of Apple seems a bit too far off from the common work-environment for that purpose. I think of something the northwind database that came as an example with MS-Access (is it still?), or the Filemaker templates, that are mostly sufficient for most of the information needs for small organisations, and can be used right away. Of course, it would be expandable in an easy way with examples of how to expand it (localizations, custom components etc). Preferably the example would link up to most of the popular databases (mysql, postgresql, openbase, frontbase, filemaker, oracle, ms-sqlserver, db2, etc).
This example (or examples) should be the reason that people start using WebObjects. A re-implementation of some opensource solution developed in PHP, J2EE or .NET to prove the efficiency of WebObjects compared to these development tools would also be nice (the open source J2EE ERP solution www.compiere.org comes to mind). For developers/ICT people some kind of asset-bug-project-time-support- tracking-software selling system would be nice, and would spread the reputation of WebObjects among the group that would be capable of steering investment-decisions in the WebObjects direction.


Johan Henselmans

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: Michael Warner <email@hidden>
    • Re: WebObjects Foundation
      • From: Asa Hardcastle <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: WebObjects Foundation (From: "Marc Oesch" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: All this activity
  • Next by Date: Eclipsing Xcode?
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects Foundation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread