• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)


  • Subject: Re: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:10:51 -0700


On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:


WO in Java or Objective-C? What would be most sensible going forward?

Given that there is a lot of enterprise Java code out there that WO in Java can and does take advantage of (e.g. as it now uses JDBC to replace the need for custom adaptors). Given that WO in Objective- C would require adaptors to be written for all the required databases (this was a sticking point somewhat for WO when it was in Objective-C)

Of course, I know that Objective-C is a much more powerful language (with categories and the like) but Java does have some things going for it as well (e.g. portability). Also if WO went back to Objective-C it could once again use Apple's development tools, whereas it would not be possible to use all the great Java functionality in Eclipse.

Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially EOF) since WO4.5 and Java's enterprise connections (and recent language improvements) and ability to deploy in Servlet containers etc) that it would be best to stay with WO in Java (e.g. if implementing a new open source WO).

I quite like Objective-C as a language. I much prefer it to Java. That said, moving WO back to Obj-C is nothing something I would be in favour of. There are just too many 3rd party libraries in Java.


 Chuck

--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects





_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)
      • From: Dana Kashubeck <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source? (From: Ricardo Strausz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source? (From: Dana Kashubeck <email@hidden>)
 >WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?) (From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)
  • Next by Date: Re: awakeFromInsertion Oddity
  • Previous by thread: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)
  • Next by thread: Re: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread