• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06


  • Subject: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:40:21 -0700


On Aug 28, 2006, at 10:32 AM, David Sanchez wrote:

Hallo!

It is also well-known that Apple does not want to open source WO.

But, if Apple does not plan to open WO, IT HAS to re-write documentation.

No, it doesn't. Please stop making silly and illogical arguments. It is getting quite annoying.


Apple is a company and does not have to do anything that it does not want to, provided that such inaction is legal. Not writing documentation is not illegal. Apple is not making money directly from WO as a product so it will do whatever makes business sense for it to do.


It is almost impossible to get new developers interested in WO development without docs and tutorials up dated.

Why do you think that Apple cares? Its only use for new WO developers is to staff its internal projects. If a developer can't "pick it up" from the documentation there is (and some being developed WOLips side), they probably will never be up to snuff for Apple's internal projects.



And, things happens... Old programmers can die, jump to other platform or quit programming.

So, if that's the case, Apple strategy for WO is just let it die.

Define die. It has not been a money making product for quite some time (ever?).


Chuck

I think there is close to zero (very close to zero ;-) chance that
Apple will rewrite any of the WebObjects documentation to include the
open source community tools.

I think there is almost zero (somewhat near zero ;-) chance that
Apple will write any more general documentation for WebObjects
(besides the API docs generated by JavaDoc).

I don't think Apple is going to exert any effort to develop "new"
WebObjects developers, but obviously won't mind if the community does.


Of course, Apple may do otherwise but if they don't then I think this
is a clear message about how Apple values WebObjects and sees its
future.

Cheers,
Ashley.

--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!)

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40global-village.net


This email sent to email@hidden

--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects





_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
      • From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06 (From: David Sanchez <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Next by Date: Unprocessed changes on an object without changes
  • Previous by thread: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Next by thread: Re: Looks like ThinkSecret got some of the scoop on WO from WWDC'06
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread