• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?


  • Subject: Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
  • From: John Larson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:20:27 -0500

Hello,


I think the api implies they all work and will have differing outcomes depending on what you would like to 'sum' or 'count' etc. e.g., Consider the keypath: 'company.people.accounts.totalLiability'.


If I want to know how much is owed in total:
Number total = ( Number )company.valueForKeyPath ( "@sum.people.accounts.totalLiability" );

I am curious if you have actually used this?

Obviously not enough! Bummer...

I meant company.valueForKeyPath ( "email@hiddenLiability" ) - but that's still wrong. You can only provide toOne keyPaths after @sum it seems (i.e., "email@hiddenLiability" ) which will succeed (having now tested).


You can think of the keypath as a tokenized string that is evaluated recursively through the elements toward the end of the string and the @operators are looking for scalar values to iterate over and accumulate. So, for company.people.account.totalLiability where people is the only array, then email@hiddenLiability would produce the sum as desired. Suppose, however, that each person had multiple accounts. The following would also be valid: email@hiddenemail@hiddenLiability.


The point of this was to not leave the thread with the idea that there can only be one @operator in a keypath.

John
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
      • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
    • Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
      • From: John Larson <email@hidden>
    • Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Proper place for functions in KVC paths? (From: "John Huss" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths? (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths? (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths? (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths? (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: custom display for WOToManyRelationship destinationDisplayKey
  • Next by Date: Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
  • Next by thread: Re: Proper place for functions in KVC paths?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread