Re: Performance on new xserves ?
Re: Performance on new xserves ?
- Subject: Re: Performance on new xserves ?
- From: Asa Hardcastle <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:58:20 -0500
No experience on G5s. But on G4s it _seemed_ to make a big difference.
asa
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Thanks Asa! Have you had any experience of 1.4 vs 1.5 JVM on
G5's ? I'm wrestling with whether or not to change to 1.5, and
performance improvements would certainly be a good reason.
On Nov 30, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Asa Hardcastle wrote:
We ordered two xserves today also, so we'll probably have some
stats soon also, although we won't have anything to compare fairly
to until next year.
As for the xeons, we've been developing on Mac Pros since early
September, they are ridiculously fast. We've found that 1.5 far
exceeds 1.4 in performance, especially with the Wonder AJAX
frameworks. And we've seen the boost from Java 1.5 across the
board on fast and slow machines. As a disclaimer -- we have not
done extensive testing (any testing in fact) to understand the
performance boosts we're seeing.
later,
asa
On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:59 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Has anyone had the opportunity to try WebObjects out on the new
Xeon xserves? If so, what was performance like, and what JVM
were you using?
I'm still a little confused about how/when 64 bit will be / is
available for Java...
Well, we ordered ours today, so I guess we can do some stats
before New Year Eve. I just got an iMac Core Duo 17", it's damn
fast (it take 35 seconds to build Wonder's frameworks).
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40zenn.net
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden