• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL for Blobs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL for Blobs


  • Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL for Blobs
  • From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:54:05 +0100

On 20.02.2006, at 17:50 Uhr, Loren Cahlander wrote:

I am creating a WebObjects application that will have at least three tables containing blobs. Two containing UniCode text and one containing binary data. My database preference is PostgreSQL, but it seems that MySQL has an easier to understand implementation of large objects.

?

I use PostgreSQL a lot for storing BLOBs and it just works (you may have to increase the applications memory for really large objects).

I use bytea combined with NSData and text or varchar combined with String objects. No problem.

cug

--
PharmaLine, Essen, GERMANY
Software and Database Development


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >PostgreSQL vs MySQL for Blobs (From: Loren Cahlander <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL for Blobs
  • Next by Date: Re: WebObjects licensing still unclear / XCode 2.1 no longer available ?
  • Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL for Blobs
  • Next by thread: quick question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread