• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Many-to-Many without Flattened Relationship
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Many-to-Many without Flattened Relationship


  • Subject: Many-to-Many without Flattened Relationship
  • From: Anthony Martello <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:12:08 -0700

Guys,

I have a similar question to Jim's regarding many-to-many relationships except that in my join table I have more information than simply the two keys (the scenario mentioned by Mike); so I can't use a flattened relationship.

Here is my situation.

I have a three tables: Account, CourseAccess and Course. Each customer from Accounts can purchase access to one or more courses from Course for a limited time. Account has PK userId and Course has PK courseId. CourseAccess is a join table with attributes courseId, userId and endDate. To keep track of which user is purchasing the course, I have an instance of Account in the session named "account" and method currentAccount() which returns "account" (not sure if I need this last).

My questions are:

1) Is this the best way to set this up by keeping the endDate attribute in the join table?
2) Once the relationship is set up in EOModeler: a) how do I add a course to a client (I assume I will use addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey) and b) how do I set the endDate in the join table?


I appreciate any help.

Sincerely,

Anthony Martello

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Many-to-Many without Flattened Relationship
      • From: Art Isbell <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Sophisticated relationship help
  • Next by Date: Re: Many-to-Many without Flattened Relationship
  • Previous by thread: Re: URI for static html/image
  • Next by thread: Re: Many-to-Many without Flattened Relationship
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread