Re: WWDC WO Meet
Re: WWDC WO Meet
- Subject: Re: WWDC WO Meet
- From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:49:29 +0200
On 12.07.2006, at 2:20 Uhr, Chuck Hill wrote:
I am not surprised that the presentation is easier in WO, HTML is a
rather simple, constrained UI. The difference in business logic
between CoreData and WO/EOF is intriguing. What is in CoreData /
lacking in WO that makes CoreData easier?
I don't know how they want to build an application that incorporates
CoreData AND uses a Client-Server-Model AND compare the development
speed with WebObjects. EOF and CoreData look similar but are designed
for a very different target market.
And as long as SQLite is the only "database type" storage backend for
CoreData, it's not really an option for applications where you also
think of using WebObjects or an enterprise class database.
cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden