Re: Is it bad to put Objects in EO derived classes
Re: Is it bad to put Objects in EO derived classes
- Subject: Re: Is it bad to put Objects in EO derived classes
- From: Baiss Eric Magnusson <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:26:50 -0800
On Oct 31, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Baiss Eric Magnusson wrote:
I need to add a BigDecimal to each Transaction record, I added
it to
public class Transaction extends EOGenericRecord
as a local object. I don't instantiate it until it is needed.
My question is, even though it is transient, is it better to add
it to the base EOModel, so it exists in the DB?
I've read that it is bad to put Objects in EO derived classes.
If I understand correctly, this is just a cached valued used for
optimization.
Yes.
I'm assuming you're using EOGenerator and generating 2 different
class files, right? That's really the best way to do it, then you
add your variables in the non underscore class. I do this all the
time.
No I don't use EOGenerator and generate 2 different class files, is
there any more on that, examples, etc.
----
Baiss Eric Magnusson
<http://www.Track-Your-Finances.com>
<http://www.CascadeWebDesign.com>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden