• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO to go openSource?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO to go openSource?


  • Subject: Re: WO to go openSource?
  • From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:21:22 -0500

When does Apple drop the second shoe? They said they are working with OpenSource, etc., and will have an announcement again... soon?

It would be nice to hear more from Apple. I mean I am quite sure that 4 developers would have zero impact on their bottom line. And, if they do a good job and WebObjects starts to grow again,,, they will surely sell more servers.

So, Apple, give us some direction.

James Cicenia

On Sep 11, 2006, at 12:25 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote:


On 11/09/2006, at 1:16 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:

On 10/09/2006, at 11:31 AM, .::welemski::. wrote:

Is WebObjects really going to be openSource?

It depends whether or not you call "deprecating all the current tools, and hoping the community will replace them with open source equivalents and even write a whole lot of new documentation, whilst keeping the core product and documentation proprietary" going open source?


I don't. I call it a great deal, for Apple. They obviously need help these days ...

Now the other side of me (hence the additional post ;-) wonders what else they could have done. Trying to compete with the Java IDEs (like Eclipse and IntelliJ) was a losing battle.


The technology (e.g. the Java Bridge) within some of the current tools (EOModeller, WOBuilder and the Xcode Plugin) was end-of-life'd.

I guess they could have paid a nice salary to a few open source developers, maybe the current ones who have done so much to make this possible, to continue without "the other job."

That said, I believe that there are already a few Apple employees who currently work (at least partly) on the open source tools (at least they are committers).

So maybe it is a reasonable deal for everyone.

Cheers,
Ashley2.

PS Perhaps someone in Apple could write some "public domain" documentation for the new open source tools. I don't believe its the kind of thing that OS (or any) developers hang out to do? _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40jimijon.com


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WO to go openSource?
      • From: Ian Joyner <email@hidden>
    • Re: WO to go openSource?
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
References: 
 >WO to go openSource? (From: ".::welemski::." <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO to go openSource? (From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO to go openSource? (From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WO to go openSource?
  • Next by Date: Xcode : copy web component
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO to go openSource?
  • Next by thread: Re: WO to go openSource?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread