• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*


  • Subject: Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*
  • From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:50:31 -0500


On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:


On Apr 11, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:

This is one of Jerry's reponses:

http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2005/Jul/msg00509.html


I am trying to wrap my mind around what Jerry has written here. It's going to take me a while, I think.


You can go to lists.apple.com and pretty much search your heart out.

What Chuck is suggesting happening is that you have something on your page (like a WOConditional) that's state is bound to something that is changing.

Or you are altering the contents of an array that is bound to a WORepetion. That would be my guess based on your description of this page. Adding, removing, or moving the elements of an array while WO is in a repetition will have very, very odd effects from scrambled data to exceptions.


Chuck

I am altering two arrays that are bound to WORepetitions by moving an object from one to the other, but how is this different than if I had simply deleted/added an object from/to a relationship? Those functions alter the contents of arrays bound to WORepetitions as well and yet seem to work just fine.





When the form post comes back, WO tries to match up the structure of the page to get all the values out, and it effectively 'gets lost'. What I usually do is have hyperlink or submit actions modify temporary variables that are not referenced during page creation. Then, I override appendToResponse() in the component and update the real data from the temporary variables. This way, you guarantee that your page structure is the same.

Ken

On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:47 PM, David Avendasora wrote:

Okay, I'm having a hard time finding the info by googling for it. Any chance of a link?

Thanks,

Dave

On Apr 11, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:

You can look for my prior postings too... I've even written up a decent solution a couple of times... :)

On Apr 11, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

Paging Mr. Walker, Mr. Jerry Walker. Mr. Jerry Walker, please come to the WO List. :-)

This is one of Jerry's most favored rants. I am pretty sure that what is happening is that you are modifying the structure of the page while it is processing the takeValues phase. Search for some of Jerry's past postings on this for the cause and solution.

Chuck




--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects









_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Updating Nested To-Many Relationship (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *SOLVED* (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED* (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED* (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED* (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED* (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED* (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED* (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: No instance found alert ?
  • Next by Date: Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*
  • Previous by thread: Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*
  • Next by thread: Re: Updating Nested To-Many Relationship *NOT SOLVED*
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread