Re: Snapshot problems SOLVED, FOR REAL, NO JOKE
Re: Snapshot problems SOLVED, FOR REAL, NO JOKE
- Subject: Re: Snapshot problems SOLVED, FOR REAL, NO JOKE
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:30:06 -0700
On Apr 22, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
Holy crap, people! I finally got the stupid code to work without
any hacks! Ok, I'm excited because it's finally working, but
things still may be broken all over the place. I haven't tested
extensively yet. The problem? NESTING THE EDITING CONTEXT. I'm
not kidding. It was a matter of changing
ERXEC.newEditingContext(session.defaultEditingContext())
to
ERXEC.newEditingContext();
And if you're using Project Wonder's automatic locking, there are
no problems (that I've found) with needing to lock. Heck, I
imagine you could keep an editing context in session like I was
doing earlier and lock and unlock in awake/sleep as long as it
wasn't nested in the session's default ec (although I have not
bothered to verify this yet).
The more I think about it, why would you ever need to use a nested
editing context instead of a component level peer editing context?
I use them for Wizard like functionality where I want to verify
(validate) the displayed information before allowing the user to move
onto the next step. So I have one child EC per step and save the
parent (which is usually a peer ec) at the very end.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden