• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"


  • Subject: Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:22:07 -0700


On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:

Hi!

On 2007/08/13, at 21:44, Chuck Hill wrote:

Then something in your app is refreshing the to-many relationship.

Well, the problem is much more strange than I thought (we are entering the "you surely know how to have fun with WO" zone!).

Yes, yes we are. :-)


  I have the a.bs() to-many relationship.

  I have a cycle where I do the following (pseudo-java-code):

  while( optimistic locking failures exists ) {
    NSMutableArray array = new NSMutableArray();

    B newB = makeNewB();
    array.addObject(newB);
    a.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationship( b, "bs" );

a.editingContext().processRecentChanges(); // Just in case, but doesn't appear to help

    PrintALotOFStuffHere;

    try {
      saveChanges();
    } catch OL exception {
      for all objects obj in array {
        obj.removeObjectFromBothSidesOfRelationship( a, "a" );

Have you tried a.removeObjectFromBothSidesOfRelationship( obj, "bs" );

obj.editingContext().deleteObject(obj);

Have you made other changes in the EC? If not, ec.revert() should handle all this much more cleanly.



      }
      array.removeAllObjects();
      // Do some refaults
    }
  }

  In "print a lot of stuff", I do print, between other stuff:

  - The Bs in the a.bs() relationship.
  - The EC deleted, inserted and updated objects.

  Well, when there's no OL failure, this works.

  When there's a OL failure, on the second try, I get the following:

The "newB" object created on the first cicle run is NOT on the bs () relationship, neither in inserted, deleted or updated objects of the EC. It makes sense: I created and destroyed it before being able to put it on the data storage.

But... it's precisely that object that causes my error. When I try to saveChanges in the second run, I get an exception saying the object is not registered on any EC. Also, all it's relationships are "null", so I did not forget to remove it from any relationship.

Does something else have a relation to the B entity?



So... if my object belongs to no EC, and if it's not related to any other object... why the heck is it causing problems? It shoudn't even exist at that point. How can I ask WO why is it caring about that object when saving?

The only other thing that comes to mind is the ec.undoManager(). Perhaps this is getting called at somepoint and undoing your deletion of the new B objects. ec.revert()...



Chuck

--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects






_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
      • From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness" (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
  • Next by Date: Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
  • Previous by thread: Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
  • Next by thread: Re: Yes, even one more concurrency question - relationship "freshness"
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread