Re: JSF
Re: JSF
- Subject: Re: JSF
- From: "Shravan Kumar.M" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:36:59 +0530
| Hi,
I like working with WebObjects, am just worrying about the market which is not identifying its value and going with all different technologies like: Hibernate, Spring, JSF, Flex, Tapestry,... Thanks & Rgds, Shravan Kumar.M
"Let us learn from the past to profit by the present,and from the present to live better in the future." --William WordsWorth ---------------------------------------------------------------
From: Andrus Adamchik <email@hidden> Date: 21 December 2007 1:19:12 AM GMT+05:30 To: WebObjects Dev <email@hidden> Subject: Re: JSF
Yeah... JSF is a mess. So is the underlying JSP. Tapestry can't keep compatibility with itself for more than a year in a row, and hence can't be used for enterprise applications that have a much longer maintenance lifespan. And now with web development going all _javascript_, the talent pool for potential open source WO challengers is quickly draining. So WO is doing quite well by comparison and might just keep claiming the best HTML component framework position for years to come. Go figure :-)
Andrus
On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:29 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
http://www.jsftutorials.net/components/pic/relationship.jpg I think this sums up JSF quite nicely :)
ms
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden