Re: WebObjects documentation site
Re: WebObjects documentation site
- Subject: Re: WebObjects documentation site
- From: Steven Mark McCraw <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:11:46 -0400
Andrew,
I am sympathetic to your concerns. There has been some thought given
to migrating the pages over, but there was also a large volume of
concern expressed that the content be reorganized, so a straight
programmatic migration doesn't seem to be what everyone wants. We
expect most of the content to make its way over soon, but we'll
probably be doing it a piece at a time to restructure a bit.
Mark
On Jul 2, 2007, at 4:07 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello;
Gee; that really is a shame because I've loaded quite a few pages
into the Wikipedia books site. Can it be migrated over somehow?
Given the volume of stuff there it may be worth just staying on the
Wikipedia books site?
cheers.
..... and should content be out here instead of wikipedia? (IMO,
better have it here in objectstyle maintained by community than
wikipedia)
The consensus of everyone who discussed this was that the objectstyle
site was better than the wikipedia site. I do not remember any
objections whatsoever to the objectstyle site, so that's where we
decided to nudge people to post things.
___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden