Re: WOBuilder Replacement
Re: WOBuilder Replacement
- Subject: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 19:38:25 -0700
Stateful NonSynchronized Reusable Components are pretty useful as well.
On Jul 4, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Topic = "Stateless NonSynchronized Reusable Components" ........
these make life easier and easier
On Jul 4, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
3. Large, convoluted, table based layouts are very difficult to
visualize in a text only view. This is pretty obvious, but
since I've been using css instead of tables and breaking things
into components for my own stuff forever, I've not confronted
it head-on before. So I think using the component editor
actually encourages you to write better components.
We can hope. I have been disturbed to see how little use many
WO developers make of the power of components. It should be
their bread and butter, not some advanced technique.
Topic for WOWODC 2008 ? :-)
In fact that is one of the topics I am considering.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve
specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mac.com
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden