WO used internally by Apple, a bad thing?
WO used internally by Apple, a bad thing?
- Subject: WO used internally by Apple, a bad thing?
- From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:32:25 +0200
This post ought to be sent to WO-talk, but I can't post there right now.
A lot of people say that because Apple is using WO internally, we
need not worry about WO death.
I agree with that, but I am starting to wonder whether Apple using WO
is a good thing for WO...
If Apple had chosen another technology for iTunes store, the Apple
Store and .mac, WO would no longer be a matter of competitive
advantage for Apple and therefore, Apple could open source it.
WO would have evolved much faster if Apple was not using it. What is
the reason for sticking with apache 1.3 and java 1.4 for so long if
not Apple internal apps? Isn't WO evolving slowly because Apple needs
to keep it compatible with old code it uses in its internal
applications, and old deployment platforms?
What prevent Apple from publishing clear roadmaps for WO? The fact
that the future of the product depends on Apple's internal needs,
which can vary a lot, and that Apple does not want to disclose.
Overall, I am not sure that Apple using WO internally is a very good
thing for WO.
JPM
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden