• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WOBuilder Replacement
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WOBuilder Replacement


  • Subject: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 03:57:05 -0400


Le 07-07-05 à 03:12, Jean Pierre Malrieu a écrit :

Has there been any development in a replacement for WOBuilder?

Although XCODE is dead I rely quite a lot on some sort of visual
binding and element view and so keep on using it for that.

Any news would be good - I have seen the thread on the WIKI but
that does not have a conclusion - and I would love to contribute
financially to a basic but functional replacement.

Mike Schrag and I kicked this idea around a while back. We made a ballpark estimate of US$100,000 to US$150,000 in development costs. Still want to contribute financially? :-)

Yes why not? That's 100$ for 1000 persons, or 200$ for 500 persons. It seems reasonable to me.

The problem is that we don't have those numbers. So far, we have 82 organizations who are willing to buy/finance a WO Builder-like tool, and since the average number of people per organization is 3, that means 246 possible licenses, so that means 400$ per people. _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WOBuilder Replacement
      • From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>
    • Re: WOBuilder Replacement
      • From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: WOBuilder Replacement (From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WO used internally by Apple, a bad thing?
  • Next by Date: Re: WO used internally by Apple, a bad thing?
  • Previous by thread: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • Next by thread: Re: WOBuilder Replacement
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread