• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Norman Richards on WebObjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Norman Richards on WebObjects


  • Subject: Re: Norman Richards on WebObjects
  • From: Norman Richards <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:26:48 -0500

I saw a thread on theserverside.com on failed Java projects, referring to some comments by Norman Richards - co-author of books on XDoclet and JBOSS (http://members.capmac.org/~orb/blog.cgi/tech/ java/ Java_revisionism_an.html) . In his comments he makes a positive remark about WebObjects, so I thought I'd see what else he's said about it, and found this from last year:
http://members.capmac.org/~orb/blog.cgi/tech/Open_source_WebObje.html


In the 5 years since I quit using WebSphere, I've seen nothing yet in the Java world that made me think that there was a better solution than WebObjects. It's nice to have someone as dyed-in-the- wool as Richards validate my decisions :-)

Thanks for the kind words. It is quite sad it has taken as long as it has for WebObjects-like things to make their way into the mainstream Java world. JavaServer Faces and Tapestry have brought component-based web development into Java, but neither of them give a very completely solution by themselves. Sun has done some interesting work with NetBeans (by way of Java Studio Creator) to try and give something that competitive to WO in terms of overall experience. I'm not saying that it is any better than WebObjects, but I think the average WO developer would feel relatively comfortable.


I'm currently working on an application framework called Seam. The goal is not to clone WebObjects, but I am definitely trying to make sure we learn as much as we can from WebObjects. The development model is extremely simple and would be very familiar to a WO developer. Tooling is weak, but we'll have something pretty nice with the Exadel/RedHat tools. I think WebObjects developers would be very happy with it.

My point isn't to advertise other frameworks but to say that WebObjects ideas really are being expressed in mainstream Java frameworks. It's an exciting time. It's only a shame we're coming to the party 10 years late... :)


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Prev by Date: Re: investigating mysterious death
  • Next by Date: sending html in email
  • Previous by thread: Norman Richards on WebObjects
  • Next by thread: DOM Level 3 and JavaXML.Framework
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread