• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Nested Editing Contexts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nested Editing Contexts


  • Subject: Re: Nested Editing Contexts
  • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:12 -0400

I've seen that document as well, but I noticed the date on it was the latter half of 2005. I read all of the documentation Apple had regarding WebObjects back in 2000, and I even managed to get my hands on the training manuals for the courses they used to offer on WebObjects, and I don't ever recall seeing anything like that in any of the material. Of course, that is not to say it wasn't there. I wasn't specifically looking for it, so it's easy for me to imagine myself zipping over those short paragraphs without them making a big enough impression for me to remember. It is entirely possible that something like this was available from Apple very early on and I missed it.
I noticed you mentioned the 2005 update in your first post, so just to be a pedantic jerk, I checked into this :) Jerry has referenced that paragraph as early as 2004, prior to the 2004-12-02 update listed in that document's revision history, which puts it in there in 2004. The next earlier revision listed is 2003, but it's labeled "First version of Enterprise Objects," which is sort of a sketchy title, but I think it's referring to the first version of this document, not the first version of EOF which obviously predates 2003 pretty significantly.

But this is all a silly discussion. I do agree that EOF is really bad about letting you know when you screw up. I MUCH prefer fail-fast than fail-sometime-in-the-future-really-confusingly, and EOF is all about fail-sometime-in-the-future. And while that comment IS documented, it really doesn't get the notation that it deserves. Maybe they can bold that sentence in the 2007 documentation revision :)

It's totally pointless anyway (except for that warm, happy feeling it gives me) ;)
I don't believe this is true ... I think bitching is heard, if not directly, by proxy.

ms

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Nested Editing Contexts
      • From: "Jerry W. Walker" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Nested Editing Contexts (From: "Ted Archibald" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Nested Editing Contexts (From: Steven Mark McCraw <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Nested Editing Contexts (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Nested Editing Contexts (From: Steven Mark McCraw <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Nested Editing Contexts (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Nested Editing Contexts (From: Steven Mark McCraw <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Nested Editing Contexts
  • Next by Date: Re: Nested Editing Contexts
  • Previous by thread: Re: Nested Editing Contexts
  • Next by thread: Re: Nested Editing Contexts
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread