Re: Generics in WO - Writing accessors for to-many relationship?
Re: Generics in WO - Writing accessors for to-many relationship?
- Subject: Re: Generics in WO - Writing accessors for to-many relationship?
- From: Ricardo Parada <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:27:32 -0500
On Nov 1, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
1) You should really be using EOGenerator and not writing this by
hand, it's very error prone and it's asking for problems
Thanks Mike... I'll take a look at using EOGenerator. Can you
believe I've been coding since EOF 1 and never used EOGenerator. I
know it is very popular so I guess I'm one of the exceptions. :-)
I assume the place to start is http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Generating+EO+Java+Classes
right?
2) You should really base those EOGenerator templates off of one of
the existing models
Are there templates for WO 5.4?
3) You never want to call setRecords with an array
Not sure what you mean here.
4) I don't believe NSArray.EmptyArray is genericized properly (I'm not
sure it is in Project Wonder, either). The proper definition should
be:
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T> NSArray<T> emptyArray() {
return NSArray.EmptyArray;
}
at which point you would use:
NSArray<String> emptyStringArray = NSArray.<String>emptyArray();
In the absence of that definition, you will need to cast (and add a
warning ignore).
Cool. Thanks.
:-)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden