[philosophical question] Direct component access: does it have any use at all?
[philosophical question] Direct component access: does it have any use at all?
- Subject: [philosophical question] Direct component access: does it have any use at all?
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:55:18 +0000
Hi!
I was checking out the "Preventing Direct Component Access"
section in page 137 of Practical WO book. *
This is an easy issue to avoid, as long as you know that you have
to do it.
My question is: as most people don't, shouldn't this feature be
disabled by default? This is a huge security hole. Of course all my
pages are protected with a "IsAuthenticated" wrapper, but I can't do
the same to all my little subcomponents, due to keeping my sanity.
And obviously I have no ideia how will every subcomponent react to
this kind of access, specifically if they will reveal info they they
shouldn't or just throw an exception.
So, I don't see any use at all for this "feature", as we have
Direct Actions to do this decently. The only good use for this is to
get iTunes musics and Mac Pros for free! ;) Kidding, but seriously,
this COULD be a huge security breach on many apps out there.
Should it be disabled in future versions of WO by default? I vote
for "Yes, ASAP!".
* For those of you who don't have Chuck's and Sacha's book (go buy
it NOW) the problem is that in ANY WO app you can type in the URL
bar: http://server.com/WebObjects/MyApp.woa/wo/aComponentName.wo and
you instantly load that component on the browser. Yes, really.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden