Re: WO(Re)petition
Re: WO(Re)petition
- Subject: Re: WO(Re)petition
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:04:50 +0100
Hi!
Think different: please present any valid arguments to sustain
your request.
Think different: please request what you want through the proper
channels. People are trying to create a WO Community, being the
communication between WO users and Apple a goal. If you want to help
and to make your voice be heard, you should help building the WO
Community, instead of flooding the mail-list.
Think different: please THINK if open sourcing WO is what you
really want. Because what I want is Apple to actively develop it,
doing a good job that results in innovative features and QUALITY
work, and yes, documented. How many Web frameworks do you know that
are innovative, with a solid, very solid code base (with a few bugs,
naturally), and well documented... AND OPEN SOURCE? Because I don't
know any one.
Think different: open source WO clones/copies/alternatives (use
whatever pleases you) exist. Do you use them? No. Why? Because WO is
still the best. Did being open source helped? I don't think so.
Think different: if you REALLY need to look at the WO source, you
know you can.
Think different: again, stop flooding my mailbox. If you really
want to make your point, put together some decent arguments, talk
with the people who are working to build the WO Community, and use
them to get in touch with Apple.
I don't mean to be rude, but this is getting a little childish...
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden