Re: Please Opensource WebObjects
Re: Please Opensource WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Please Opensource WebObjects
- From: Alex Cone <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:48:42 -0400
Read Apple's Lips: Not Going To Happen. Period. If that means we
have to lose you to .NET, then get going and stop posting.
This topic has been discussed to death. There are some good reasons
why it isn't going to happen and your posting the 10,000th post about
it isn't going to change that.
Please, everyone, let's get back to WebObjects ==>DEV<== topics.
Alex
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:08 PM, email@hidden
wrote:
From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: WO(Re)petition
To: email@hidden
Think Different : Please Opensource WebObjects
Because, today, in France, it is almost impossible to sell any
software based on proprietary tools to public institutions (education
for example), when there are so many open source alternatives...
Open source WO or we will have to stop using it!
JPM
__alex cone
ceo c o d e f a b inc
email@hidden
212.465.8484 x101
http://www.codefab.com
The original British monentary system:
Two farthings=One Ha'penny. Two ha'pennies=One Penny. Three
pennies=A Thrupenny Bit. Two thrupences=A Sixpence. Two
sixpences=One Shilling, or Bob. Two bob=A Florin. One florin and a
sixpence=Half a Crown. Four half crowns=Ten Bob Note. Two ten bob
notes=One Pound (or 240 pennies). One pound and one shilling=One
Guinea.
The British resisted decimalized currency for a long time
because they thought it was too complicated.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden