• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Database choices
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Database choices


  • Subject: Re: Database choices
  • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:40:10 -0400

I suspect they very likely have compelling performance numbers, but I haven't had time to actually run tests with our real databases on it ... There are graphical MySQL front-ends (whereas FB's is fine, but sort of "passable"), and honestly there are pkg installs of it also at this point, so it's not a WHOLE lot more than double-click-to-install at this point. Slightly more obnoxious with permissions and users, etc, I suspect. I think FB wins pretty handily in the competition from zero-to-running-database, but how often are you doing that part? In terms of % of time spent, that's only a fraction of your db's life. I just don't want to discount it because a decade ago it sucked.

ms

On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

I am sure that you can make it go, but other than clustering, why bother? If you don't need that it seems like a lot of configuration work, research, etc. for what FrontBase gives you with a single click installer.

Chuck

On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

You know, I have thought this same thing of MySQL for years, but I think it's because I'm evaluating it based on its feature set from 1998 and not giving it a fair shake. I've read a lot of stories on, for instance, highavailability.com about huge sites that use it. I'm not too keen on the restriction that clustering is in- memory only, but it actually seems like a legitimate database these days (ONLY with InnoDB). It's on my list of things to evaluate more fairly :)

ms

On Oct 29, 2007, at 1:16 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

I am with Mike on this. If you just need free, FrontBase is hard to beat. If you must have open source, PostgreSQL. MySQL has some nice features, but... I dunno, it is still MySQLToy to me.

Chuck


On Oct 29, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

I prefer FrontBase ... It's trivial to setup, runs very well, and it's free. MySQL and PostgreSQL are obvious other choices as well.

ms

On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Ken Foust wrote:

Using Leopard > Eclipse > WOLips - which is the database of choice. I have heard postgres is the best of the opensource ones. But which one works best with replacement tool for EOModeler?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects








_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects








_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Database choices
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
    • Re: Database choices
      • From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>
    • Re: Database choices
      • From: Michael Halliday <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Database choices (From: Ken Foust <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Database choices (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Database choices (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Database choices (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Database choices (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Database choices
  • Next by Date: Re: Database choices
  • Previous by thread: Re: Database choices
  • Next by thread: Re: Database choices
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread