Re: coexisting installs of WO 5.3/5.4 on Tiger/Leopard?
Re: coexisting installs of WO 5.3/5.4 on Tiger/Leopard?
- Subject: Re: coexisting installs of WO 5.3/5.4 on Tiger/Leopard?
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:42:26 +1100
On 31/10/2007, at 5:04 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
suggestion: embed="true" for all frameworks solved much of this
multi-version garbage in deployment in the past ... probably
easiest route since WOLips ant tasks have easy "embed" flags
The thing I /do not/ like about embedding of WO supplied frameworks
is how this makes each app needlessly bulky for uploading.
So for me, if there's some work put into a better solution, then +1
from me. (This may just mean adding an option to WOLips to set a
custom location to find the system frameworks).
On Oct 30, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
Having no tool support, it should be a lot easier to configure
runtimes for multiple versions. Things like soft-linked directory
branches work a lot better when they do not have to deal with the
ObjC bridge and all its associated noise. Project Wonder, for
instance, could include scripts for configuring this. A script
could even check the integrity of deployment installs. While at
Apple, I wrote a "verify your versions" direct action. Too support-
ish and not enough aqua, so not shippable.
Seems like those shippable constraints are lifted ;-)
I am sure I will come up with other ideas, some even more useless
than some of these, when I actually have a Leopard system. We'll
see. I am open to suggestions, question, jibes, innuendoes,
catcalls, or anything short of insults. No, insults are ok, too. :-)
Plan away... much appreciated. You have a unique opportunity given
your knowledge of WO.
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden