Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?

Subject: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:36:00 -0400

This is true ...

On Sep 4, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Simon McLean wrote:

i'm sure if we moved to pure CSS based components we'd find WOCE is streets ahead of WOB


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: WebObjects documentation site

Next by Date:
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?

Previous by thread:
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?

Next by thread:
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?

Index(es):

Date
Thread