• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?


  • Subject: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • From: Thomas <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 06:03:28 +1000

Yes, I miss it a lot too. I have been using WOLips for a few months now, and have gone back to using WOBuilder for anything other than trivial changes.

The two huge things that I miss are:

- the ability to see, in a graphical way, what components are contained in other components, what they are, and (for simple things like conditionals), what their main binding is. Using WOBuilder with a complex component I can see what I need in less than a second, while it sometimes takes minutes in Eclipse to do the same thing. Although viewing tables is much easier this way, that's not the important thing. I don't need to see how the page will look-- I want to see the component hierarchy in a graphical way.

- the ability to cut or copy a whole group of elements and paste them somewhere else, bindings and all.

I have been toying with the idea of writing a document that lists each of the things we do with WO component editors, why they are important, and how well you can do them in the two main alternatives. That would help focus on the missing functionality so that we can then think of options for the mythical "WOBuilder replacement." Would anybody be interested in seeing such a thing?

Regards
Thomas

On 05/09/2007, at 1:23, Galen Rhodes wrote:

Hmmmmmm.  Ummmmmmm.  Sorry, I still miss it.  A lot.

I still miss WOBuilder when I'm working on tables. Also, in eclipse, having to cut and paste both the HTML and WOD separately is kind of a pain too. I also miss the drag -n- drop bindings.

--
Galen Rhodes
email@hidden

On Sep 4, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:

Hello;

I have some words to eat; I have to say that after some months working with the "woproject component-editor" in Eclipse, I'm not missing the graphical builder.

cheers.

___
Andrew Lindesay
technology : www.lindesay.co.nz
business : www.silvereye.co.nz


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40bunburyjamestown.org


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40woomeranet.com.au


This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
      • From: Galen Rhodes <email@hidden>
    • Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
    • Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
    • Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
      • From: Steven Mark McCraw <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement? (From: Galen Rhodes <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Auto-filtering EOF queries based on the current client
  • Next by Date: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Next by thread: Re: Maybe No Need for a WOBuilder Replacement?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread