• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Google App Engine
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Google App Engine


  • Subject: Re: Google App Engine
  • From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 12:55:07 -0400

  I do agree, I hate relational DBs. The problem is that I still didn't find any other persistent store that:

  1) Can scale and handle high load (in a real environment, not just on the spec sheet);
  2) Is affordable/free;
  3) Integrates well with powerful frameworks like WO.

http://www.intersystems.com/cache/index.html
I don't yet know a lot about this, but from reading their feature list, systems like this may be in our near future.
Feature and Benefits:http://www.intersystems.com/cache/technology/fb/fb_02.html
On Apr 8, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!

On 2008/04/08, at 17:12, Robert Walker wrote:

Speaking of that, why do we continue the "Cargo Cult" of the relational database? Isn't it about time to move past them, and begin moving to persistent storage that makes sense in the modern age of objects?
That's all I'll say on the subject. I'm not trying to start a long discussion that will all end in tears.

  I do agree, I hate relational DBs. The problem is that I still didn't find any other persistent store that:

  1) Can scale and handle high load (in a real environment, not just on the spec sheet);
  2) Is affordable/free;
  3) Integrates well with powerful frameworks like WO.

  When something comes up that meets these criteria, I will move on the first day. I feel the same as you, it's incredible how little databases have evolved in the last decades. But if making a good alternative was easy, we would have lots of them around, I guess.

  Yours

Miguel Arroz

Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com




Robert Walker
email@hidden




 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Google App Engine
      • From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Google App Engine (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Google App Engine (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Google App Engine (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Google App Engine (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Google App Engine (From: Robert Walker <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Google App Engine (From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Best Way® to test for existence of a relationship
  • Next by Date: Re: Integer i in EOModel creates Long or Integer in EOGeneration
  • Previous by thread: Re: Google App Engine
  • Next by thread: Re: Google App Engine
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread