• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Leaving WebObjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Leaving WebObjects


  • Subject: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • From: mike deavila <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 16:45:03 -0700


I think there is a lot of this with many companies doing the same thing. Without Apple support of windows, it does not have much of a future and the unsupported WOLips does not help enough. I have been on and off this list or others like it for years and I read this all the time and the WebObjects knowledge base is very small now. Apple has killed WebObjects and WOLips is just slowing the death. I have been doing WO for over a decade and I have never seen it this weak. I'm working and still doing WO (Yea!) but i'm in the process of moving off WO even-though it was a great technology. WO rest in peace...


cheers


On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Robert B. Hanviriyapunt wrote:
For some time now, my company has been set on leaving WebObjects. We have been running WebObjects 5.2 on Windows servers. We haven't moved 100% yet, but my next project will be using JavaServer Faces. And another fairly new project will be using OpenLaszlo with our existing J2E back-end.

Company's reasons for leaving:

1. WebObjects is proprietary

2. New versions of WebObjects is not supported on Windows

3. Perceived lack of knowledgeable WebObjects programmers (I'm in the Chicago suburbs -- Northbrook, IL, to be precise)

We do NOT use:

1. Xcode/WebObjects tools [Xcode or WOBuilder or EOModeler] (except for me on a MacBook Pro -- only because I requested it)

2. EOF

3. WONDER

4. Servlet container (which I do not prefer anyway)

I personally enjoy WebObjects development and wish that WebObjects would be more palatable to companies such as mine.

Please excuse the ranting, but I want someone at Apple to know that as great as WebObjects technology is [I personally think it is the BEST I've seen anywhere], it is losing ground because if it's lack in thet top 3 items mentioned. I wish so bad that Apple would do something about it.

I'm guessing people's response will be:  Don't hold your breath.

Pity.  :(

= Robert =
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40gmail.com


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Leaving WebObjects
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
    • Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Leaving WebObjects
      • From: Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists <email@hidden>
    • Re: Leaving WebObjects
      • From: Alan Ward <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Leaving WebObjects (From: "Robert B. Hanviriyapunt" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Next by Date: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Previous by thread: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Next by thread: Re: Leaving WebObjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread