• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Leaving WebObjects...think biz
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Leaving WebObjects...think biz


  • Subject: Re: Leaving WebObjects...think biz
  • From: Jeremy Matthews <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:20:08 -0400

I am not WO Developer, per se...more of a tinkerer and Middleware, techie and biz guy. Hence the installer.

However, when I do work with clients of biz that want a web app developed, we usually quote out to different firms for WO, .Net, LAMP, RoR, and the list goes on....

Quite frankly, we just ask about their preferences (if any), and usually make the business case based on the amount of resources and different timelines the project would require. We usually don't even get into the technology unless they want to maintain their own stuff and code. We offer options for each "package".

Most usually lean towards the best combination of cheapest/fastest/ highest quality (which is usually WO), unless they "discover" that it is WebObjects and they are a total fear-based MS Shop. Usually, management is making the decisions and we just show the projected costs, and time, and required resources based on each different offering. We then say "You could go MS/.Net, but it will cost an extra 30% and take longer to develop, with higher maintenance costs...your choice". While this is not ALWAYS the case, you'd be surprised how often it is...

So, we make the biz case and give options...they make the decision.

Also...when they ask about the underlying tech (.Net, LAMP, RoR, PHP, WO, etc), and it is a WO-based app, we usually say Java. Now, they always get full disclosure, but that is what WO really is...Java.

I am aware that there has been some uncertainty about WO...but you can get support, you can find developers, and the tools are probably the best they've ever been, are under contract to being developed, etc. What WO lacks is marketing and damn good documentation. I think the direction of WO is finally clear.

-2cents
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: Errors reading HTML/XML file
  • Next by Date: Re: Apache 2.2 mod_WebObjects.so on linux
  • Previous by thread: Re: Errors reading HTML/XML file
  • Next by thread: Reusable Component - create action binding
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread