Re: Staying with WebObjects
Re: Staying with WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Staying with WebObjects
- From: Alan Ward <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:20:47 -0600
On Apr 13, 2008, at 3:35 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 12/04/2008, at 6:24 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
I think the real bug-bear for people struggling to get their
companies to commit to webobjects isn't the fact that it's not
open source - i think it's the fact that you have to buy a mac to
get your hands on the frameworks.
Really? That's news to me.
Frankly, I think this is ridiculous too. I can't believe
WebObjects itself is a key driver behind mac sales so why not
just go the full hog and make the frameworks a free download from
developer.apple.com ? If apple did this i think there would be so
much more interest in WebObjects...
Not the exact hostname that you wanted but it's somewhat similar
isn't it?
http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/webobjectsdeveloper.html
I, for one, am not surprised that people have the impression of
webobjects not being available for download. Think about it...
i.e., <http://webobjects.com> forwards us to <http://
developer.apple.com/tools/webobjects> where the only mention of
download is for the Apple Developer Tools... which only runs on: Mac.
Would it be too hard to put a link on the above page to?
http://support.apple.com/kb/index?
page=search&src=support_site.kbase&fac=Downloads&q=WebObjects
And it might be nice to put links to community documentation too :-)
I have no control (or influence) over what goes on those pages. I'm
a WO user like you.
Alan
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden