Re: Would You Use WOs On A New Project
Re: Would You Use WOs On A New Project
- Subject: Re: Would You Use WOs On A New Project
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:43:22 +0100
Hi!
On 2008/04/15, at 21:57, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Apr 15, 2008, at 1:26 PM, Nolan Whitaker wrote:
All,
I suppose that I wasn't entirely clear with my question. I know
that web objects is written in Java, implementing a number of the
Cocoa classes. My question is why use a product like WOs when
classes that perform an equivalent function generally exist in the
current Java spec.
What can I do with the WebOjects classes that I can't do with
generic Java? And if there is essentially little or no additional
funcationality, why add the extra layer of code? (I'm under the
impression that there are few, if any, WO classes that can't be
mapped to one or more Java classes in combination that perform the
same function.)
In addition the the other 99% of very important WO functionality
that you are totally ignoring, most of the Java API is horrific to
use. The WO versions are much nicer.
Ahhhh came on! You are telling me you can't recall stuff like
knowing the difference between replace and replaceAll on Strings
without checking the docs? It's SO obvious! :P
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden