• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges


  • Subject: Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:45:14 -0700


On Aug 5, 2008, at 6:50 AM, email@hidden wrote:


Hi Everyone,

Sorry to rebump this question but I really want to know what our current collective consensus is on this topic.

The following thread from 2006 appears to me, at least, to be our most current and complete understanding of this issue:

http://lists.apple.com/archives/Webobjects-dev/2006/Jun/msg00121.html

Is that correct?

Does anyone know if a radar ticket was actually created and what Apple's feelings about this issue are? I mean do they recognize it, dismiss it, or what?

I am pretty sure that Lenny filed a bug report on this. Many years ago. If you care about this, you should file a new one. This is quite nasty and needs to be fixed. If there are no current bugs filed on it, it won't get fixed.




Has anyone else used Lenny's extension of EOEditingContext to positive effect? Personally, I'm testing it right now and it seems to be working but at one point yesterday it seemed that it ignored my request to delete the object but didn't throw an error either. I'm worried that it might be deferring *too many* notifications past the saveChanges() call. Some of those notifications might be mandatory for the delete to function properly or for other types of processing. I'm very worried that this fix will cause other side effects.


I did not notice other side effects from it, but it also did not solve all of the problems that I was having.


Chuck


-- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges
  • Next by Date: Re: work almost good on a leopard server with WO5.4, but fails as war on tomcat
  • Previous by thread: Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges
  • Next by thread: Re: Objects marked for delete fall into the updated objects bucket in processRecentChanges
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread