• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: sequential numbering across more instances
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sequential numbering across more instances


  • Subject: Re: sequential numbering across more instances
  • From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:01:02 -0600

On 15.08.2008, at 12:45, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:

I start to see your point. It makes it very tedious to deal with however. I've been in this situation. The decision (based on my selfless recommendations :) was not to care that 1,2,3,7,10... is ugly. They are unique. They identify things persistently. Sold.

The problem with that is, that in some countries invoice numbers are not allowed to have gaps.


As for Chuck's solution, also notice that it does not help you deal with the potential demand for edibility.

If this requirement stands, kick it. You would NEVER be happy again. These are generated numbers (for orders / invoices). As I said: in some countries it is illegal to change them once they are assigned.


cug

--
http://www.event-s.net

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >sequential numbering across more instances (From: Ondřej Čada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: sequential numbering across more instances (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)
 >Re: sequential numbering across more instances (From: Ondřej Čada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: sequential numbering across more instances (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)
 >Re: sequential numbering across more instances (From: Ondřej Čada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: sequential numbering across more instances (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: sequential numbering across more instances
  • Next by Date: Re: WOBuilder substitute for Eclipse 3.3+ in Leopard
  • Previous by thread: Re: sequential numbering across more instances
  • Next by thread: Re: sequential numbering across more instances
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread