Re: sequential numbering across more instances
Re: sequential numbering across more instances
- Subject: Re: sequential numbering across more instances
- From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:01:02 -0600
On 15.08.2008, at 12:45, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:
I start to see your point. It makes it very tedious to deal with
however. I've been in this situation. The decision (based on my
selfless recommendations :) was not to care that 1,2,3,7,10... is
ugly. They are unique. They identify things persistently. Sold.
The problem with that is, that in some countries invoice numbers are
not allowed to have gaps.
As for Chuck's solution, also notice that it does not help you deal
with the potential demand for edibility.
If this requirement stands, kick it. You would NEVER be happy again.
These are generated numbers (for orders / invoices). As I said: in
some countries it is illegal to change them once they are assigned.
cug
--
http://www.event-s.net
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden