Re: Owns Destination problem
Re: Owns Destination problem
- Subject: Re: Owns Destination problem
- From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:07:19 -0400
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Is there any chance of using ec.revert() here? Or will that revert
too much? Another work around is to do this in a child EC so if
they change their mind you can just discard the EC and carry on.
Chuck
In reality, they will likely be adding numerous things see how the
rough schedule looks, then they'll decide what they want to make more
of, and what they want to schedule on a different manufacturing line
or day and then remove those things. Reverting would remove
everything, as would discarding the EC. I want them to be able to pick
and choose a few things to remove from dozens that they added. This
was just my initial test case to add something and take it off, then
save.
What I will likely do, since there really isn't anything to be gained
by not saving, is to just save after each item, or the batch of items,
is added. Then go back and allow them to remove. I was just figuring
I'd save myself trips to the DB while they were working with the
schedule. The App and DB server are on the same machine so network
latency really isn't a problem in this situation, and only a couple
people will be using the application at once.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden