Re: application intercomunication, a question
Re: application intercomunication, a question
- Subject: Re: application intercomunication, a question
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:14:34 +1100
On 06/12/2008, at 6:19 AM, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Dec 5, 2008, at 7:50 PM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
Why SOAP is so ugly ?
"The S stands for Simple"
-- Pete Lacey, 2006
http://wanderingbarque.com/nonintersecting/2006/11/15/the-s-stands-for-simple/
While this can be a funny read... (and it's been pointed to in the
past) it's really misleading. It's like assuming that everyone's
creating bytecode directly and needs to understand bytecode in order
to program a Java application, or assembly rather than C, which is a
nonsense line of argument.
So just to balance the argument ... It certainly has its warts, but it
certainly not that bad. Likewise the suggestion that there are any
number of combination of versions available seems to be an exaggeration.
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden