• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO version from code (was: Qualifier creation)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO version from code (was: Qualifier creation)


  • Subject: Re: WO version from code (was: Qualifier creation)
  • From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:32:55 -0400

I am scratching my head at the purpose of being WO independent but depending on other projects.

JBND is not dependent on any other project, completely standalone.

For deployment WO is essentially free so I do not really see the gain.

Well, providing Cayenne users with a data binding library (if they choose to implement the support). The same for other systems that might be out there. And last but not the least, making the codebase of a fairly large client application as less depending on whomsoever as possible. Nothing against WO, but the tough times for JC just before 5.4 was released made me realize that betting on one horse is not the smartest thing to do. And making JBND WO agnostic was not so difficult.


The only way to determine the WebObjects version is to check the plist of the JavaWebObjects bundle, this is how the installer clue in. Starting with WO 5.4 there is a cover method in WOApplication that returns the version of WebObjects.

Nice. I suppose some reflection could do the trick then, for versions prior to 5.4.


Thanks,
Flor

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Qualifier creation (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Qualifier creation (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Qualifier creation (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Qualifier creation (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Qualifier creation (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >WO version from code (was: Qualifier creation) (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO version from code (was: Qualifier creation) (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Question regarding new inline style
  • Next by Date: Re: did <br> change....?
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO version from code (was: Qualifier creation)
  • Next by thread: Re: Null values at end of sorted list
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread