Re: Dealing with relationships and inheritance
Re: Dealing with relationships and inheritance
- Subject: Re: Dealing with relationships and inheritance
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:31:36 -0500
Any advice?
That it the way it is. I don't know how easy it would be to optimize these. EOF might expect there to be only a single entity per result set.
to-many fault: 2008-02-07 16:14:27,535 DEBUG 17.9 MB/12.1 MB [WorkerThread1] extensions.ERXNSLogLog4jBridge - evaluateExpression: <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.FrontbasePlugIn$FrontbaseExpression: "SELECT t0."cellTypeID", <snip> FROM "SheetCell" t0 WHERE (t0."cellTypeID" IN (1, 6, 4, 3, 2, 5) AND t0."rowID" = 1005629)">
top-level fetch: 2008-02-07 16:16:27,450 DEBUG 30.14 MB/3.26 MB [WorkerThread8] extensions.ERXNSLogLog4jBridge - evaluateExpression: <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.FrontbasePlugIn$FrontbaseExpression: "SELECT t0."cellTypeID", <snip> FROM "SheetCell" t0 WHERE (t0."cellTypeID" IN (1, 6, 4, 3, 2, 5) AND t0."maxSlots" = 5)">
So it's not definitely not doing this. I tried with an abstract and non-abstract super-entity here, and got the same results.
I checked another app and tried a polymorphic to-one fault: Feb 07 16:27:50 MDTask[60756] (ERXNSLogLog4jBridge.java:44) DEBUG NSLog - evaluateExpression: <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.FrontbasePlugIn$FrontbaseExpression: "SELECT <snip> t0."RequestTypeNumber" <snipagain> FROM "Request" t0 WHERE (t0."RequestTypeNumber" IN (1, 2, 3) AND t0."RequestID" = 1006678)">
It's possible that Wonder fixes this, but I don't think I wrote that if it does ... I'll look through the code some. Can anyone not using Wonder verify this?
ms |
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden