Re: 2 WOLips Questions.
Re: 2 WOLips Questions.
- Subject: Re: 2 WOLips Questions.
- From: "Pierce T. Wetter III" <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:30:58 -0700
On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Jean-François Veillette wrote:
subversion is a nice improvement over cvs, but if you are going to
switch, now is the time to take a look at the other options ...
Take a look at git (and/or mercurial) :
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/cvs-migration.html
I think git's branching model is way better than the directory copy
of svn. And other (I've not used svn enough to tell myself) say
that the merging capabilities of svn are not really better to cvs,
if compared to git.
git only require one .git/ directory at the root of it, not in every
directory inside, so you won't have any problem with tools
integrations. git already has 2 nice gui (built with tcl-tk), it
has web front-end, and even the start of an eclipse plug-in.
I've used cvs for far too long (and still have to). I've played
with svn for a short time period. I've used bzr for nearly 2 years,
I've now switched to git for nearly one year. I'm very pleased with
the result ! I've successfully converted many cvs repository
(amongst them wonder's repository), and it make the history more
clear and easier to follow.
svn + svk is actually pretty interesting. svk is a set of perl scripts
that make local branches and sharing branches between users much
easier and more along the bzr model but with the idea that at some
point, you're going to commit everything to a master repository
anyways. Just using svk to manage your local branches can be pretty
cool.
Except unless there's an eclipse plugin for it, I really wouldn't
consider it for WO development...
Pierce
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden