• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: locations of DST information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: locations of DST information


  • Subject: Re: locations of DST information
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:46:03 -0800


On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:

I understand this problem quite well but I just curious of how much code is out there.

I am fairly certain that we have some other stuff using the format binding. We use NSTimestampFormatter in about 95% of our code. It is all pretty concentrated, so updating this will not be too painful.



I personally have moved out of NSTimestampFormatter a long time ago so I am probably a bad judge.

I think that is probably true. :-) I think the people to keep in mind are not the power users, but the people with less experience. There are probably more of them and they are more likely to use this and the format binding and will have more trouble making this change. Add to that the large number of applications using this class and the need to do something much more than just recompile and test and the "cost" of a better solution starts to look really worth while.



I will have a look into the problem but I cannot guarantee anything.

I (and I am guessing this is getting obvious) really think that there should be a bridge in place, as simple as it might be. Please.


Chuck


On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:47, Mike Schrag wrote:

Having NSTimestampFormatter as a "symbol translating sub-class" would ease the pain of transition for many.
Yeah, this is what I'm proposing as well ... I feel Pierre's pain with not wanting to rewrite and maintain deprecated code, but I fear WO becoming what everyone hates about Tapestry, which is that it goes through huge breaking revisions every release. There is a large base of legacy apps, and especially if there are relatively straightforward deprecation routes, it would be better to not break than to break, I think (this is obviously subject to a religious debate, I suspect). I'm especially wary of breaking changes that just break semantics rather than syntax. In this case, it's breaking the interpretation of random strings inside of WODs, which will make for a really annoying fix. Alternatively, I suppose someone could write a conversion app to convert all the old style into new style, but that only partially addresses the issue.

ms

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40apple.com


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40global-village.net


This email sent to email@hidden

--

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects






_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Art Isbell <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: locations of DST information (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: locations of DST information
  • Next by Date: Re: locations of DST information
  • Previous by thread: Re: locations of DST information
  • Next by thread: Re: locations of DST information
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread