Re: locations of DST information
Re: locations of DST information
- Subject: Re: locations of DST information
- From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:38:55 -0700
On 28.01.2008, at 16:09, Chuck Hill wrote:
It allows interoperation with 3rd party Java libraries while keeping
the nicer API from NS. Use Java, but keep the WO abstractions.
That is where I was heading. I came from Cocoa to WebObjects and I
loved WO despite it being rolled over to Java soon enough. But I have
a hard time getting good feelings for a lot of the Java implementations.
WebObjects is the only Java based tool I ever liked - this might be
because I come from Cocoa, but I also think it is one of the best
thought our tools out there. Java was not too bad as long as they
copied OpenSTEP, but then they started re-factoring at Sun ... not
that WebObjects is perfect - not at all, but I still think that there
are way more pressing things to be re-done than date formatters and
these others would make the tool even better, while getting rid of the
formatter wrapper will break a lot of existing code (again).
And Anjo has a really valid point with d2w model files, formatter
strings in code, localizations and so on. There are tons of places
where this will break for no real benefit.
cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden