Re: SimpleDateFormat vs [Deprecated] NSTimestampFormatter
Re: SimpleDateFormat vs [Deprecated] NSTimestampFormatter
- Subject: Re: SimpleDateFormat vs [Deprecated] NSTimestampFormatter
- From: "Gennady Kushnir" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 03:10:53 +0400
> NSTimestampFormatter also understands the SimpleDateFormat pattern symbols.
> Just use the SimpleDateFormat symbols for both.
Does it work only for 5.4 or also for earler versions of WO?
Gennady
2008/7/9 Chuck Hill <email@hidden>:
>
> On Jul 8, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Gennady Kushnir wrote:
>
>> Hello list!
>> As mentioned in WO 5.4 documentation NSTimestampFormatter class is now
>> deprecated.
>> They recommend using java.text.SimpleDateFormat instead. Pattern
>> formats for NSTimestampFormatter and SimpleDateFormat a different.
>> But when binding WOString and WOTextFiend it still takes patterns for
>> dateFormat in old NSTimestampFormatter style.
>>
>> I want to store and reuse some global setting for date format pattern.
>> But now I have to either use different patterns for WOD bindings and
>> programmatic use
>> or rely on deprecated NSTimestampFormatter and get warnings each time.
>
>
> NSTimestampFormatter also understands the SimpleDateFormat pattern symbols.
> Just use the SimpleDateFormat symbols for both.
>
> Also note that unlike NSTimestampFormatter, SimpleDateFormat is not thread
> safe. At least NSTimestampFormatter is not documented to be non-thread
> safe.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> --
>
> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall
> knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden