Re: Maven Optimism
Re: Maven Optimism
- Subject: Re: Maven Optimism
- From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:33:46 +1000
On 11/07/2008, at 3:50 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Henrique Prange wrote:
The rest of the patternsets are also not an Ant issue, but a
design philosophy in woproject (to not force a project layout).
Maven don't force a directory layout also.
My point was that using either Maven or woproject, if you want a
flexible layout you need to do more work. If you can accept a set
layout, your life is easier. It is not an Ant vs Maven issue as
Pierce was suggesting.
Right. It's another alternative.
I don't know if Pierce's intention was to create a this vs that thing
in general... more of a 'what works for him' thing which he thought
he'd share. Obviously, assuming this assumption is correct, this was
taken instead as an early jab given Mike's on the verge of dropping
the classpath <boom> ;-)
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden