Re: What is the best way to handle invalid values from a WOTextField?
Re: What is the best way to handle invalid values from a WOTextField?
- Subject: Re: What is the best way to handle invalid values from a WOTextField?
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:14:11 -0700
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 16/07/2008, at 2:59 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 15, 2008, at 9:51 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 15.07.2008, at 18:36, Chuck Hill wrote:
I just tested this now and got a class cast exception in the
released version of 5.4.2 when I typed a string into a text
field with a formatter on it:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String
[2008-7-15 17:19:11 PDT] <WorkerThread13>
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String
at
net
.foo
.core
.searchfields
.DateSearchField.qualifyOnValue(DateSearchField.java:64)
That is just an out and out bug. I don't see how it can be
fixed other than by replacing WOTextField
Reported as 6078428.
AFAIK, this renders 5.4.2 worthless to me. Well, unless someone
patches it in Wonder. :-P I am not sure that I will bother yet.
Isn't there already something in Wonder that should fix this in
ERXWOTextField? Not sure though, just checked briefly in the source.
It looks like ERXWOTextField is similar to the 5.3.3
implementation, so if you are using Wonder with this patched in as
WOTextField then you won't have problems.
Is the problem just limited to WOTextField?
I think just WOTextField formats input.
What other diffs are there between Wonder's and WO5.4.x for this
stuff?
No idea. The two classes look quite different.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden