• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: More efficient web service choice
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More efficient web service choice


  • Subject: Re: More efficient web service choice
  • From: David den Boer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:21:06 -0700

Same with us. A properly architected API solves all of these problems and then some. You have to architect it using only standard java data types -- dont use EOF/NS or collections -- you screw yourself when working with non-java clients.

What I like best about SOAP -- its dead simple to develop for when you use WO, and rock-solid. We even have stateful webservices using database backed sessions -- all of our API's (except authenticate) take a SessionInfo object (our own object type made of simple objects including a wosid), and we restore the session from the database using that object.

If you're developing rock-solid enterprise class API's to be used by clients across a wide spectrum of tools/operating systems, I think you can do no wrong using SOAP. If you like PHP or RoR, go the other way :-)




On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:

On 19/06/2008, at 1:52 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:

On 18.06.2008, at 00:03, David den Boer wrote:

We use SOAP webservices on many of our applications, some of which receive several hundred thousand transactions daily without any issues. I find the ease of using SOAP over other options so much better, especially when using WO (which is also quite a bit faster than using JBOSS or Tomcat for webservices BTW).

SOAP is just a bitch if you don't have only WO apps connecting to each other or if you have several versions of Axis (from different clients) or if WO somehow decides not to create a completely correct WSDL (happened a couple of times in the past).


So, SOAP *might* be an option, personally I like the more less complex protocols better. SOAP is just plain not simple and easy and straightforward.

I haven't had that experience (not to invalidate yours). Our non-wo apps happily communicate with our WO app (even using differing Axis versions).


with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: More efficient web service choice
      • From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
    • Re: More efficient web service choice
      • From: Travis Britt <email@hidden>
References: 
 >More efficient web service choice (From: "John Huss" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: More efficient web service choice (From: David den Boer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: More efficient web service choice (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: More efficient web service choice (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Entity Modeller == EOModeler?
  • Next by Date: Re: More efficient web service choice
  • Previous by thread: Re: More efficient web service choice
  • Next by thread: Re: More efficient web service choice
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread