• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: State of WO Java Client
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: State of WO Java Client


  • Subject: Re: State of WO Java Client
  • From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:13:25 -0400


On Mar 06, 2008, at 16:37, David Avendasora wrote:

Your templates are converted and posted! http:// wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2655245

Cool, thanks, will provide them also on the JBND site.

What's the word on JBND's WO 5.4.1 compatibility? Any issues that you know of?

Nope, but I should be getting into this sometime soon...

One issue, off the top of my head... The JBND convention for to-many relationships is to return them in the List<DataObject> form. In WO5.2, and 5.3 I am manually translating from NSArray to List<DataObject>, but I was hoping that in 5.4 the List implementation of NSArray is good enough for this not to be necessary. If this is true, then I'd try to implement JBND so it dynamically detects WO version, and depending on that translates NSArrays, or simply returns them.

Next, in EOFDataObject I override validateForDelete() because of a bug in EODistributedClassDescription that causes EOF, client side, to ignore deletion rules when it comes to validating for deletion (they are taken in account when you actually delete the object). If this is fixed in 5.4, the override would not be necessary. Or, maybe they intentionally ignored deletion rules on validation on the client to prevent fault firing, thus optimizing things. Which is bad, bad, bad.

Anyway, I hope to do some testing on 5.4 soon. Will keep the community apprised, and JBND ready for it. At the moment, to the best of my knowledge, it should work.

Btw, a new update of JBND, containing some new features, and major bug fixes, is coming soon. I am just now in the process of shifting our apps to it, and thereby doing some serious testing of it.

Flor
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >State of WO Java Client (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: State of WO Java Client (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)
 >Re: State of WO Java Client (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Solved]: How to get sub-component data up to parent
  • Next by Date: MEETING: Chicago CocoaHeads/CAWUG - iPhone SDK (duh! what else this month)
  • Previous by thread: Re: State of WO Java Client
  • Next by thread: Re: State of WO Java Client
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread