• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails


  • Subject: Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
  • From: Daniel Brajkovic <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:17:26 -0500

I think Mike Schrag only knows about some project called Wonder. So obviously, he would be of no help.


On Mar 14, 2008, at 9:08 AM, David Avendasora wrote:

Yeah, but do you know anything useful about WO?

On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

I'm actually in Richmond, so I might be up for a little hike up to the next meeting ...

ms

On Mar 14, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote:

Greetings,

I am know this has been covered repeatedly, but I just went to a mac developers group meeting last night (in Northern Virginia), and there was a demonstration of ruby on rails development on a mac, and three of the people were gushing about how great it is, and no one (other than me. . . to a limited extent) even mentioned WO. Does anyone have any new insight about why people should consider WO instead of Ruby on Rails?

It seems everyone everywhere (outside of this list) thinks that WO has been left to "whither on the vine" or "had some really advanced technology" before being left to whither on the vine, etc.

Ideally, I'd love to be able to do a demo of WO and WOLips/Wonder, etc. at a future meeting, but I am not up to the necessary level of expertise to field the questions from these guys. I have worked with webobjects on and off over the years, but I'd like a better argument than I can make with my unfortunately limited recent involvement.

Any suggestions, insight would be helpful.

Thanks!

Andrew
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >WO vs. Ruby on Rails (From: "Andrew R. Kinnie" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: String Qualifier for Number
  • Next by Date: Re: WO vs Ruby on Rails
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
  • Next by thread: Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread